Kind of like local news. I can’t stand it, so I don’t watch it.

Life’s too short to let a blog harsh your buzz, man.

Sorry you don’t understand English.

Correct usage, you are an imbecile. I wasted enough time on you.

No, I am not the author of Iguana, but thanks for playing!!!

Also, please learn the definition of “egalitarianism.” I know big words are fun, but when you use them incorrectly it is embarrassing.

I never said you didn’t have the right to call anyone names, I said your arguments lack substance. I don’t mind debating you on the substantive points, but when you start making defensive comments to supposed arguments I never made, it becomes pointless. Please read, comprehend, then respond, instead of writing reflexive, gibberish. Thank you in advance.

Your comment about negativity and envy doesn’t make any sense. In fact, I can’t even respond because it is so off-the-wall. Please explain and I will be happy to discredit you (again).

People should never be cynical? Um, ok. How is that for a normative statement from an anonymous commenter? “People should be happy all the time!!!” “People should never wear black!!!!” Making baseless opinion statements on blogs is fun!!!!

Please list your full name, address, email and other identifying info. You should have no problem doing this since you feel that anonymous people should not make negative comments. You are making negative comments about me, so you should reveal who you are.

Reporting that people are losing their jobs is not reveling in people’s misfortunes. It is called reporting. Iguana doesn’t make the news, just comments on it (like every other blog out there).

I am sorry you lost your job. Perhaps if you were as smart as you think you are you would still have one. Oh, that’s right. You are “retired.” Uh huh. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuure.

Again, I am sorry your crappy company with crappy drugs forced you into early retirement.

1. I will, thanks for you egalitarianism

2. No you can judge eggs all you like and bcause you are anonymous, you are a chicken. I would take your evaluation of an egg more seriously if you were an accomplished biologist though. BTW, I am retired from the industry so the rest of your comments are irrevelant.

3.No people should not be cynical – ever. They should ask probing questions of managment, use existing mechanisms for investor input/control and strive for corporate transparency, etc.. What is shallow and cheap is using other people’s misfortune to grind your own personal axe. I am guessing you come from the buy-side analyst world (probably a silver spoon, Ivy league MBA nerd that never spent any time running a company or creating any actual shareholder value).

1. Me – I say you should have put your ass on the line somewhere, somehow- if you want readers to respect your point of view. So there!

2. When you resort to comments like “welcome to America where people are free to voice their opinions” – duh, I reserve the right to call you an imbecile.

I’m sorry your negativity and envy is showing. Lose the the google earth photos of people’s houses, fake empathy for those losing their livelihoods while you revel in managment’s misfortunes and instead provide good, honest information with transparency on who you are and you will be providing a valuable news source for the industry.

First: I never said that I didn’t like you voicing your opinion. In fact, I love it. Please keep it up!

Second: You do not have to be a chicken to judge an egg. By saying that the author of this blog or any other blog should put up their accomplishments, you are trying to change the subject and get attention off of, I would guess, one of your crappy drugs that this blog has probably pointed is crappy.

Third: People should be cynical about drugs and companies that expect investors to pour $$$ into , but get defensive if people start trying to analyze their value. Yes, I would be very cynical, indeed. It is up to YOU to make a good product and a good company, not up to anonymous bloggers to make you look good.

Fourth: Where does it say that people have to put their ass in the line of fire before they are allowed to comment on public companies? That is plainly absurd.

Fifth: When you resort to ad hominen attacks such as calling people names (i.e. “imbecile”) that is a sure fire way to tell you have no argument of substance.

Lastly: I am sorry your drugs suck. If they were any good you obviously wouldn’t be so angry.

p.s. say hi to your mom for me.

I was “voicing my opinion” and if you don’t like move to Cuba. What a bunch of imbeciles. Anyone can be an armchair quarterback. Let Iguano list his personal set of accomplishments in operating a pharmaceutical company and let the record earn the reader’s respect for his opinions is all I’m asking. This rampant cynicism in today’s society is disturbing, especially among anonymous blogoshere participants. Most of you are just mid-level, BMW drivers who hide within companies and take every chance to revel in others problems wiithout ever putting your ass in the line of fire.

—-HCM

Enough of your sarcasm. What pharmaceutical/biotech value have you created personally. Please list them on this website for all of us to evaluate.

Your pretend egalitarian interest for the laid off company employee is wearing thin. You’re just scaring away potential investors who might just help executives get needed financing and really save jobs.